Fístula pancreática: una complicación temida. Experiencia en una unidad de cirugía hepatobiliopancreática de cuarto nivel / Pancreatic fistula: A feared complication. Experience in a fourth level hepatobiliopancreatic surgery unit

Introducción. La fístula pancreática postoperatoria es una de las complicaciones más importantes en la cirugía hepatobiliopancreática. Su diagnóstico se hace mediante la presencia de un nivel de amilasa en el líquido de drenaje al menos tres veces por encima del valor de la amilasa en suero a partir del tercer día postoperatorio. El objetivo de este estudio fue caracterizar los pacientes con fístula pancreática postoperatoria en nuestra institución, evaluando la importancia de la detección temprana y el establecimiento de un manejo oportuno. Métodos. Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, que incluyó los pacientes sometidos a pancreatoduodenectomía, con diagnóstico de fístula pancreática postoperatoria como complicación de cirugía hepatobiliopancreática, en el Hospital Internacional de Colombia, en Piedecuesta, entre enero del 2017 y diciembre de 2020. Se excluyeron los pacientes con otro tipo procedimiento quirúrgico y aquellos que decidieron no participar en el estudio. Resultados. Se evaluaron 69 pacientes, con un predominio del sexo femenino (n=38; 55,1 %) y mediana de la edad de 57 años. El 33,3 % (n=24) de los pacientes intervenidos desarrollaron fístula pancreática postoperatoria, siendo el 23,2 % fuga bioquímica, grado B 8,7 % y grado C 2,9 %, para quienes se indicaron manejo expectante, control ecográfico y reintervención, respectivamente. Fallecieron 5 pacientes (7,2 %). Conclusiones. La fístula pancreáticapostoperatoria es una complicación para tener en cuenta en todos los pacientes sometidos a pancreatoduodenectomía. Existen estrategias que pueden permitir disminuir la incidencia de esta complicación, con el fin de mejorar el desenlace, el pronóstico y la morbilidad posquirúrgica.

Introduction. Postoperative pancreatic fistula is one of the most important complications in hepatobiliopancreatic surgery. Its diagnosis is made by the presence of an amylase level in the drainage fluid at least three times above the serum amylase value from the third postoperative day. The objective of this study was to characterize patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula at our institution, evaluating the importance of early detection and to establish a timely management. Methods. Descriptive, retrospective study that included patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with a diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula as a complication of hepatobiliopancreatic surgery at the Hospital Internacional Colombia, between January 2017 and December 2020. Patients with another type of procedure performed by this specialty and those who did not decide to participate in the study were excluded. Results. A total of 69 patients were included, the median age was 57 years with a predominance of females (n=38; 55.1%). 33.3% (n=24) of the operated patients developed postoperative pancreatic fistula, with 23.2% having a biochemical leak, grade B in 8.7% and grade C in 2.9%, for whom expectant management, ultrasound control and reintervention were indicated, respectively. Five patients died (7.2%). Conclusions. Pancreatic fistula is a complication to take into account in all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. There are strategies that can reduce the incidence of this complication and thus improve not only the outcome but also the prognosis and postoperative morbidity.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on postoperative day three as a biochemical predictor of clinically significant pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Distal pancreatectomy is a frequent procedure and postoperative fistula, its most common complication, has an incidence of 30 to 60%. The aim of the present work was to study the role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, as indicators of inflammatory response in the setting of pancreatic fistula. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients that underwent distal pancreatectomy. The diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula was made according to the definition proposed by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The relation of postoperative pancreatic fistula to the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was determined in the postoperative evaluation. SPSS v.21 software was utilized for the statistical analysis and a P<.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (27.2%) developed grade B or grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula. ROC curves were constructed and a threshold of 8.3 (PPV 0.40, NPV 0.86) was established for the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, with an area under the curve of 0.71, sensitivity of 0.81, and specificity of 0.62, whereas a threshold of 33.2 (PPV 0.50, NPV 0.84) was established for the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, with an area under the curve of 0.72, sensitivity of 0.72, and specificity of 0.71. CONCLUSION: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio are serologic markers that can aid in identifying patients that will present with grade B or grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula, thus helping to provide an opportune focus on care and resources.

Complicaciones de cirugía de Whipple en un paciente pediátrico con tumor pseudopapilar de páncreas / Complications of Whipple procedure in a pediatric patient with pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas

Las neoplasias de páncreas son una entidad poco frecuente en pediatría; el tumor pseudopapilar de páncreas (TSP) es el más comúnmente diagnosticado. Habitualmente, se localizan en la cabeza del páncreas. La cirugía de Whipple o pancreatoduodenectomía es la técnica elegida para el tratamiento de los tumores benignos o malignos de páncreas. Si bien la mortalidad conocida ha descendido en los últimos años, debido a la mayor experiencia de los cirujanos y al mejor cuidado pre- y posoperatorio, la morbilidad se ha mantenido elevada secundaria a las complicaciones asociadas. Dentro de estas se destacan retardo en el vaciamiento gástrico, colecciones intraabdominales, fístula pancreática, reestenosis del sitio quirúrgico y hemorragia pospancreatectomía. Se presenta el caso clínico de una niña de 13 años con diagnóstico de TSP que recibió tratamiento quirúrgico efectivo desde el punto de vista oncológico, pero que requirió una internación prolongada secundaria a las complicaciones quirúrgicas.

Pancreatic neoplasms are rare in pediatrics; the pseudopapillary tumor (PPT) of the pancreas is the most common. PPTs of the pancreas are usually located in the head of the pancreas. A pancreaticoduodenectomy or Whipple procedure is the technique of choice for the treatment of benign or malignant pancreatic tumors. Although mortality for this cause has decreased in recent years, due to the greater experience of surgeons and improved pre- and postoperative care, morbidity has remained high secondary to associated complications. These include delayed gastric emptying, intra-abdominal collections, pancreatic fistula, surgical site restenosis, and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage. Here we describe the clinical case of a 13-year-old girl diagnosed with PPT of the pancreas who underwent an effective surgery in terms of cancer treatment, but who required a prolonged hospitalization secondary to surgical complications.

Diagnóstico y tratamiento del traumatismo de páncreas / Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic trauma

El traumatismo pancreático es una entidad poco frecuente pero potencialmente mortal, del que es necesario un alto nivel de sospecha clínica. El diagnóstico precoz y la valoración de la integridad del conducto pancreático son relevantes, siendo la lesión ductal el principal predictor de morbimortalidad. La mortalidad global es del 19%, ascendiendo al 30% en presencia de compromiso ductal. El abordaje diagnóstico y terapéutico es multidisciplinario (médico cirujano, radiólogo e intensivista). La analítica de laboratorio muestra elevación de las enzimas pancreáticas, siendo este hallazgo de baja especificidad. En pacientes con hemodinamia estable, la primera aproximación diagnóstica debe ser con una tomografía computarizada multidetector con contraste, recurriendo a la colangiopancreatografía endoscópica retrógrada o a la colangiorresonancia en caso de sospecha de lesión ductal. El propósito de esta revisión es analizar la etiopatogenia y fisiopatología del traumatismo pancreático, presentando su abordaje diagnóstico y terapéutico y sus complicaciones más frecuentes (AU)

Pancreatic trauma is a rare but potentially lethal entity which requires a high level of clinical suspicion. Early diagnosis and assessment of the integrity of the pancreatic duct are essential since ductal injury is a crucial predictor of morbimortality. Overall mortality is 19%, which can rise to 30% in cases of ductal injury. The diagnostic and therapeutic approach is multidisciplinary and guided by a surgeon, imaging specialist and ICU physician. Laboratory analysis shows that pancreatic enzymes are frequently elevated, which is a low specificity finding. In hemodynamically stable patients, the posttraumatic condition of the pancreas is firstly evaluated by the multidetector computed tomography. Moreover, in case of suspicion of ductal injury, more sensitive studies such as Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography or cholangioresonance are needed. This narrative review aims to analyze the etiopathogenesis and pathophysiology of pancreatic trauma and discuss its diagnosis and treatment. Also, the most clinically relevant complications will be summarized (AU)

[Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic trauma]. / Diagnóstico y tratamiento del traumatismo de páncreas.

Pancreatic trauma is a rare but potentially lethal entity which requires a high level of clinical suspicion. Early diagnosis and assessment of the integrity of the pancreatic duct are essential since ductal injury is a crucial predictor of morbimortality. Overall mortality is 19%, which can rise to 30% in cases of ductal injury. The diagnostic and therapeutic approach is multidisciplinary and guided by a surgeon, imaging specialist and ICU physician. Laboratory analysis shows that pancreatic enzymes are frequently elevated, which is a low specificity finding. In hemodynamically stable patients, the posttraumatic condition of the pancreas is firstly evaluated by the multidetector computed tomography. Moreover, in case of suspicion of ductal injury, more sensitive studies such as Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography or cholangioresonance are needed. This narrative review aims to analyze the etiopathogenesis and pathophysiology of pancreatic trauma and discuss its diagnosis and treatment. Also, the most clinically relevant complications will be summarized.

Síndrome de desconexión del conducto pancreático

El síndrome del ducto pancreático desconectado (SDPD) consiste en la disrupción del ducto pancreático principal con pérdida de continuidad entre el remanente pancreático distal viable y el tracto gastrointestinal, generalmente causado por necrosis ductal secundaria a pancreatitis aguda grave. Esto resulta en fuga de fluido pancreático, provocando un curso de enfermedad prolongado y complicaciones. La literatura sobre este tema es limitada, con algoritmos de tratamiento poco claros. Hemos realizado una revisión de la literatura sobre el tema. Revisión en Pubmed y Scielo (2011-2021) de artículos en inglés y español utilizando términos «síndrome del conducto pancreático desconectado», «DPDS» y «páncreas desconectado» encontrando 16 artículos relevantes. Dadas las pocas citas, se revisaron las referencias de estos artículos. Finalmente, revisamos un total de 21 artículos. Entre las referencias encontradas existe 1 metaanálisis, 4 estudios prospectivos y no existen ensayos aleatorizados.

Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is characterized by disruption of the main pancreatic duct with a loss of continuity between the viable upstream pancreatic parenchyma and the gastrointestinal tract, generally caused by ductal necrosis after severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis. This compromised ductal integrity leads to extraductal leakage of pancreatic secretions, causing a prolonged disease course and complications. The existing literature is limited, with unclear therapeutic algorithms. We have performed a review of the literature on DPDS. Review in Pubmed and Scielo (2011-2021) of articles in English and Spanish using the terms "disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome", "DPDS" and "disconnected pancreas" finding 16 relevant articles. Given the few citations, the references of these articles was reviewed. Finally, we found 21 articles. Among them, there is one meta-analysis, 4 prospective studies and no randomized trials.

Alternative fistula risk score and first postoperative day drain fluid amylase as predictors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy / Escore alternativo de risco de fístula e níveis de amilase do fluido de drenagem no primeiro dia de pós-operatório como preditores de fístula pancreática após pancreaticoduodenectomia

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The high morbidity and mortality rates of pancreaticoduodenectomy are mainly associated with pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, the most fragile and susceptible to complications such as clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. AIMS: The alternative fistula risk score and the first postoperative day drain fluid amylase are predictors of the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. No consensus has been reached on which of the scores is a better predictor; moreover, their combined predictive power remains unclear. To the best of our knowledge, this association had not yet been studied. METHODS: This study assessed the predictive effect of alternative fistula risk score and/or drain fluid amylase on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in a retrospective cohort of 58 patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy. The Shapiro-Wilk and Mann-Whitney tests were applied for assessing the distribution of the samples and for comparing the medians, respectively. The receiver operating characteristics curve and the confusion matrix were used to analyze the predictive models. RESULTS: The alternative fistula risk score values were not statistically different between patients in the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and non- clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula groups (Mann-Whitney U test 59.5, p=0.12). The drain fluid amylase values were statistically different between clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and non- clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula groups (Mann-Whitney U test 27, p=0.004). The alternative fistula risk score and drain fluid amylase were independently less predictive for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, compared to combined alternative fistula risk score + drain fluid amylase. CONCLUSION: The combined model involving alternative fistula risk score >20% + drain fluid amylase=5,000 U/L was the most effective predictor of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula occurrence following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

RESUMO RACIONAL: A alta morbimortalidade da pancreaticoduodenectomia está associada, principalmente, à anastomose pancreatojejunal, a mais frágil e suscetível a complicações como a fístula pancreática pós-operatória clinicamente relevante (clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula - CR-POPF). OBJETIVOS: O escore alternativo de risco de fístula (alternative fistula risk score) e os níveis de amilase do fluido de drenagem no primeiro dia pós-operatório (first postoperative day drain fluid) são preditores da ocorrência de fístula pancreática pós-operatória clinicamente relevante. Nenhum consenso foi alcançado sobre qual das pontuações é um melhor preditor; além disso, seu poder preditivo combinado permanece obscuro. Até onde sabemos, essa associação ainda não havia sido estudada. MÉTODOS: Este estudo avaliou o efeito preditivo do escore alternativo de risco de fístula e/ou do fluido de drenagem no primeiro dia pós-operatório em uma coorte retrospectiva de 58 pacientes após pancreaticoduodenectomia. Os testes de Shapiro-Wilk e Mann-Whitney foram aplicados para avaliar a distribuição das amostras e para comparar as medianas, respectivamente. A curva de características operacionais do receptor e a matriz de confusão foram utilizadas para analisar os modelos preditivos. RESULTADOS: Os valores do escore alternativo de risco de fístula não foram estatisticamente diferentes entre os pacientes dos grupos fístula pancreática pós-operatória clinicamente relevante e não- fístula pancreática pós-operatória clinicamente relevante (teste U de Mann-Whitney 59,5, p=0,12). Os valores de fluido de drenagem no primeiro dia pós-operatório foram estatisticamente diferentes entre os grupos fístula pancreática pós-operatória clinicamente relevante e não- fístula pancreática pós-operatória clinicamente relevante (teste U de Mann-Whitney 27, p=0,004). O escore alternativo de risco de fístula e fluido de drenagem no primeiro dia pós-operatório foram independentemente menos preditivos para fístula pancreática pós-operatória clinicamente relevante, em comparação com escore alternativo de risco de fístula + fluido de drenagem no primeiro dia pós-operatório combinados. CONCLUSÕES: O modelo combinado envolvendo escore alternativo de risco de fístula>20% + fluido de drenagem no primeiro dia pós-operatório=5.000 U/L foi o preditor mais eficaz da ocorrência de fístula pancreática pós-operatória clinicamente relevante após pancreaticoduodenectomia.

Distal pancreatectomy: experience in a National Hospital.

AIMS: To compare the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing open DP (ODP) and laparoscopic DP (LDP); and to analyze the association between the section site of the pancreas and pancreatic fistula. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical, perioperative, and histopathologic data of patients who underwent ODP and LDP between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: 70 patients were included. 39 (56%) underwent ODP and 31 (44%) underwent LDP. The tumor size in ODP group was 70mm and in LDP group was 45mm (p = 0,032) Blood loss was lower in LDP group (229mL versus 498mL) (p = 0,001). Operative time, spleen preservation, B/C pancreatic fistula, major morbidity, reoperation, and length of hospital stay, were similar in both groups. There was no postoperative mortality. No differences were found in B/C pancreatic fistula rate regarding to pancreatic transection site. CONCLUSIONS: LDP is a safe procedure, with perioperative outcomes similar to ODP and with less blood loss. The pancreatic transection site did not influence post-operative pancreatic fistula rate.

OBJETIVOS: Comparar los resultados a corto plazo de pacientes intervenidos mediante pancreatectomía distal abierta (PDA) y laparoscópica (PDL); y analizar si el lugar de la sección del páncreas tiene relación con la formación de fístula pancreática. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Serie retrospectiva y descriptiva de las PD realizadas, desde enero del 2009 a diciembre del 2019. Se compararon las características clínicas, perioperatorias e histopatológicas de pacientes con PDA y PDL. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 70 pacientes. Treinta y nueve casos (56%) con PDA y 31 casos (44%) con PDL. El tamaño tumoral promedio en la PDA fue de 70 mm y en la PDL 45 mm (p = 0.032). La pérdida sanguínea fue menor en la PDL (229 vs. 498 ml) (p = 0.001). No se encontró diferencia significativa en tiempo operatorio, porcentaje de preservación esplénica, fístula pancreática B/C, reoperación, morbilidad mayor y estancia hospitalaria. No hubo mortalidad postoperatoria. No hubo diferencias en la formación de fístula pancreática con respecto al lugar de sección del páncreas. CONCLUSIONES: La PDL es un procedimiento seguro, con resultados perioperatorios similares a la PDA y con menor pérdida sanguínea. El lugar de sección del páncreas no tuvo relación con la formación de fístula pancreática.

Reinforced duct-mucosa anastomosis (REDMA). New alternative after cephalic duodepancreatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Of the possible complications after a cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (CPD), the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (PPF) is the most important, especially in patients with pancreas of a soft consistency. The main objective of this work is to analyze the different postsurgical complications, with special emphasis on the rate of PPF on soft pancreas with a risk of moderate/high PPF, and its incidence between the two different types of sutures used by our group (classic vs reinforced duct-mucosa anastomosis [REDMA]). METHODS: Retrospective observational study, between January 2017 and March 2020, of patients undergoing CPD in our unit after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Analysis of preoperative, intraoperative factors and postoperative complications observed during follow-up. RESULTS: Sample of 34 patients; 67.6% (n = 23) of them under the classic protocol and 32.4% (n = 11) with REDMA. The only post-surgical complication in which we obtained statistical repercussion, without differences between cases and controls in terms of the risk of FPP, in favor of the REDMA anastomosis is that of FPP. Thanks to this surgical innovation, both the complications from stage IIIb, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and the mean hospital stay have also been reduced with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: When REDMA reduces the rate of PPF in patients with moderate/high surgical risk of it, we consider it to be a useful alternative to consider in the reconstruction of transit after CPD.

Abordaje percutáneo transgástrico en la disrupción ductal del páncreas: serie de casos / Percutaneous transgastric approach in pancreatic ductal disruption: Case series

Resumen Se presentan 6 pacientes con disrupción ductal del páncreas (DDP) tratados mediante drenaje percutáneo guiado por imágenes con apoyo de la endoscopia. Inicialmente, los pacientes presentaron necrosis pancreática infectada tratada con drenaje percutáneo transgástrico y luego de resolver la infección desarrollaron DDP. En el estudio por imágenes se diagnosticaron 4 pacientes con disrupción ductal parcial y 2 con disrupción total, a quienes se les indicó la colocación de una prótesis transgástrica percutánea para lograr el drenaje del líquido pancreático hacia el estómago. La duración promedio de la prótesis fue de 183 días; no hubo casos de mortalidad. Se pudo evidenciar que esta opción terapéutica mínimamente invasiva tiene baja morbimortalidad, por lo que se plantea el abordaje percutáneo transgástrico apoyado por la endoscopia como posible tratamiento de la DDP.

Abstract A total of six patients with pancreatic ductal disruption (PDD), treated with image-guided endoscopy percutaneous drainage were enrolled. Initially, patients had infected pancreatic necrosis, treated with transgastric percutaneous drainage, and after the infection was controlled, they developed PDD. In the imaging study process, four patients were diagnosed with partial duct disruption and two patients with complete duct disruption. In both cases the placement of a percutaneous transgastric prosthesis to drain the pancreatic fluids to the stomach was indicated. The prosthesis remained 183 days on average and there were no mortality cases. This therapeutic minimally invasive alternative has low rates of morbimortality and thus, the endoscopy percutaneous transgastric approach is considered as a viable treatment in PPD.

Drenaje percutáneo trans-gástrico de necrosis pancreática amurallada complicado en paciente pediátrico / WON transgastric percutaneous drainage complicated in a pediatric patient

Resumen Las complicaciones de la pancreatitis aguda se dividen en sistémicas y locales, y entre estas últimas se encuentran las colecciones líquidas pancreáticas agudas, la colección necrótica aguda, el pseudoquiste y la necrosis amurallada pancreática. Se reporta el caso de niña de nueve años con pancreatitis aguda idiopática severa, quien desarrolló una necrosis pancreática amurallada de 75 x 45 mm. Por la persistencia del dolor abdominal y la intolerancia a la vía oral, a pesar del manejo médico, se indicó un abordaje percutáneo transgástrico para su tratamiento. Se obtuvo éxito técnico y terapéutico a través del drenaje de la colección, permitiendo iniciar la vía oral y disminuyendo los requerimientos de analgesia. La paciente evolucionó satisfactoriamente, con alta quirúrgica a los 13 días y retiro del catéter a los 30 días. A los cuatro meses de seguimiento se evidenció una colección recidivante asintomática, manejándose de manera conservadora. Lo anterior permite considerar que el abordaje percutáneo transgástrico es una técnica segura y eficaz; sin embargo, evaluar la efectividad y morbimortalidad en población pediátrica requiere de otros estudios que posibiliten llegar conclusiones que generen mayor evidencia científica.

Abstract The complications of acute pancreatitis are divided into systemic and local such as acute pancreatic fluid collections, acute necrotic collection, pseudocyst and pancreatic walled necrosis. The case of a nine-year-old girl with idiopathic severe acute pancreatitis who developed a pancreatic walled necrosis of 75 x 45mm is reported. Due to the persistence of abdominal pain and intolerance to the oral route, despite medical treatment, a trans gastric percutaneous approach was indicated for the treatment of pancreatic walled necrosis. Technical and therapeutic success was obtained through the drainage of the collection, allowing to start the oral route and decreasing the analgesia requirements. The patient evolved satisfactorily, with surgical discharge after 13 days and removal of the catheter after 30 days. After 4 months of follow-up, a recurrent asymptomatic collection was evidenced, being handled in a conservative manner. The above mentioned allows considering that the trans-gastric percutaneous approach is a safe and effective technique; however, evaluating the effectiveness and morbimortality in pediatric population requires other studies that make possible to reach conclusions that generate more scientific evidence.

Colocación intraoperatoria anterógrada de stent pancreático y plastia de ligamento redondo para prevenir la fístula pancreática tras la pancreatectomía distal / Anterograde intraoperative pancreatic stent placement and round ligament patch to prevent pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy

La fístula pancreática tras la pancreatectomía distal supone una de las complicaciones más frecuentes y con mayor morbilidad asociada en este tipo de cirugía. Hasta el momento ningún método empleado se ha mostrado eficaz en reducir la fístula pancreática de forma contrastada. Presentamos el desarrollo de una nueva técnica quirúrgica que combina la colocación del stent pancreático junto con la colocación de parche autólogo de ligamento redondo sobre el borde pancreático. Tras la realización de la transección pancreática, se introduce de forma anterógrada la prótesis pancreática previo paso de una guía. Se comprueba la colocación de la prótesis y se cierra el conducto de Wirsung. Por último, se realiza una plastia autóloga de ligamento falciforme. A las 6-8 semanas se retira la prótesis vía endoscópica. La técnica ha sido empleada en 2 pacientes sin presentar fístula pancreática postoperatoria. Esta técnica combinada pretende introducir un nuevo elemento en la prevención de la fístula pancreática mediante una técnica reproducible sin una dificultad técnica añadida. (AU)

Postoperative pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy is one of the most important complications in this surgery and it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy remains an unsolved problem and none preventive procedure has been shown effectively. We present a new technique that combine pancreatic stent placement with round ligament autologous patch over pancreatic edge. A guide is introduced through Wirsung duct prior to stent placement. After stent assessment, Wirsung duct is closed. Finally, falciform ligament autologous patch is placed over pancreatic edge. After 6-8 weeks, the stent is removed by oral endoscopy. This technique introduces a new issue on the pancreatic fistula prevention. (AU)

Anterograde intraoperative pancreatic stent placement and round ligament patch to prevent pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. / Colocación intraoperatoria anterógrada de stent pancreático y plastia de ligamento redondo para prevenir la fístula pancreática tras la pancreatectomía distal.

Postoperative pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy is one of the most important complications in this surgery and it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy remains an unsolved problem and none preventive procedure has been shown effectively. We present a new technique that combine pancreatic stent placement with round ligament autologous patch over pancreatic edge. A guide is introduced through Wirsung duct prior to stent placement. After stent assessment, Wirsung duct is closed. Finally, falciform ligament autologous patch is placed over pancreatic edge. After 6-8 weeks, the stent is removed by oral endoscopy. This technique introduces a new issue on the pancreatic fistula prevention.

Reinforced duct-mucosa anastomosis (REDMA). New alternative after cephalic duodepancreatectomy. / Anastomosis ducto-mucosa reforzada (REDMA). Nueva alternativa tras la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica.

INTRODUCTION: Of the possible complications after a cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (CPD), the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (PPF) is the most important, especially in patients with pancreas of a soft consistency. The main objective of this work is to analyze the different postsurgical complications, with special emphasis on the rate of PPF on soft pancreas with a risk of moderate/high PPF, and its incidence between the two different types of sutures used by our group (classic vs reinforced duct-mucosa anastomosis [REDMA]). METHODS: Retrospective observational study, between January 2017 and March 2020, of patients undergoing CPD in our unit after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Analysis of preoperative, intraoperative factors and postoperative complications observed during follow-up. RESULTS: Sample of 34 patients; 67.6% (n = 23) of them under the classic protocol and 32.4% (n = 11) with REDMA. The only post-surgical complication in which we obtained statistical repercussion, without differences between cases and controls in terms of the risk of FPP, in favor of the REDMA anastomosis is that of FPP. Thanks to this surgical innovation, both the complications from stage IIIb, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and the mean hospital stay have also been reduced with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: When REDMA reduces the rate of PPF in patients with moderate/high surgical risk of it, we consider it to be a useful alternative to consider in the reconstruction of transit after CPD.

Fístula pancreática posduodenopancreatectomía: Pancreatogastrostomía vs. Pancreatoyeyunostomía / Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Pancreaticogastrostomy vs. Pancreaticojejunostomy

Antecedentes: la duodenopancreatectomía (DPC) continúa siendo el tratamiento de elección para los tumores periampulares. Con una mortalidad de alrededor del 5% y una morbilidad que puede llegar a alrededor del 50%, la fístula pancreática es todavía la complicación preponderante. Diversos autores sostienen que la anastomosis del páncreas con el estómago tiene menor índice de fístula que cuando se realiza con el yeyuno. Objetivo: comparar la incidencia de fístula pancreática en las pancreatogastrostomías (PG) versus pancreatoyeyunostomías (PY). Evaluar algunos factores de riesgo de fístula. Material y métodos: se evaluaron 91 DPC, 43 de ellas con reconstrucción con PG y 48 con PY. Se evaluaron datos demográficos, quirúrgicos, y se comparó la incidencia de fístula entre ambos. Resultados: la incidencia global de fístula fue de 13 pacientes (14,3%), 5 de las cuales fueron de relevancia clínica. En la comparación de ambos grupos hubo diferencias en cuanto a edad y número de pacientes con Wirsung < 3 mm, el resto de los parámetros fue similar. No hubo diferencias entre ambos grupos con respecto a la cantidad de fístulas (p: 0,478). Respecto de la evaluación de factores predisponentes para fístula, tan solo un diámetro del Wirsung < 3 mm fue significativo. Conclusión: en nuestra serie y al igual que en otras no hubo diferencias en cuanto a fístulas pancreáticas entre PG y PY, lo que nos permite inferir que la adopción y confección sistemática de una ellas obtendrá los mejores resultados.

Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is still the treatment of choice in patients with periampullary tumors. Pancreatic fistula is the most common complication with a mortality rate of 5% and 50% of morbidity. Some authors state that the anastomosis of the pancreas with the stomach would decrease the incidence of pancreatic fistula when compared with pancreaticojejunostomy. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pacreaticogastrostomy (PG) versus pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and analyze the risk factors associated with the development of fistula. Material and methods: 91 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were evaluated; 43 with PG reconstruction and 48 with PJ reconstruction. Demographic and surgical data were evaluated and the incidence of pancreatic fistula with both techniques was compared Results: The incidence of fistula for the total series was 14.3% (n = 13) and 5 were clinically relevant. There were differences in age and pancreatic duct diameter < 3 mm between the groups. The incidence of fistula was similar in both groups (p = 0.478). Pancreatic duct diameter < 3 mm was the only significant predisposing factor for the development of fistula. Conclusion: In our series, and in coincidence with others, there were no differences in the incidence of pancreatic fistulas between PG and PJ. Practicing and mastering a repetitive, standardized technique would yield the best results.

Actualidad en fístula pancreática postoperatoria / Current status in postoperative pancreatic fistula

RESUMEN Fundamento: el cáncer de páncreas presenta una alta mortalidad, producto que la mayoría de las veces se diagnóstica en etapa avanzada. El tratamiento de elección es la resección quirúrgica, la cual debida a su complejidad está acompañada de una morbimortalidad importante, cuando no se realiza en centros de alto volumen. Dentro de las complicaciones, la fístula pancreática postoperatoria, es de aparición frecuente. Objetivo: realizar una revisión sistemática actualizada acerca del concepto y clasificación de la fístula pancreática postoperatoria. Métodos: se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura con la base de datos SCOPUS bajo los criterios que establecen sus revisores, se utillizaron las siguientes palabras claves: pancreatic fistula, pancreatic surgery, complications, mortality, Whipple procedure. Se incluyeron todas las publicaciones en inglés y español. El método de análisis y síntesis se utilizó para la interpretación de la bibliografía. Resultados: se revisaron 175 artículos, de los cuales, se escogieron 55, que cumplían con los criterios de selección. Entre ellos, cuatro metanálisis, ocho artículos de revisión y 33 artículos originales. Conclusiones: el concepto y clasificación de la fístula pancreática postoperatoria constituye una herramienta válida para la comparación de resultados quirúrgicos entre instituciones. La centralización de la atención en centros de alto volumen constituye la principal medida para disminuir esta complicación.

ABSTRACT Background: pancreatic cancer presents a high mortality, a product that most of the time is diagnosed in advanced stage. The treatment of choice is surgical resection, which due to its complexity is accompanied by significant morbidity and mortality when it is not performed in high-volume centers. Among the complications, the postoperative pancreatic fistula is of frequent appearance. Objective: to carry out an updated systematic review about the concept and classification of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Methods: a systematic review of the literature was carried out using the SCOPUS database under the criteria established by its reviewers, using the following keywords: pancreatic fistula, pancreatic surgery, complications, mortality, Whipple procedure. All publications in English and Spanish were included. The method of analysis and synthesis was used for the interpretation of the bibliography. Results: 175 articles were reviewed, of which 55 were chosen that met the selection criteria. Among them, 4 meta-analyzes, 8 review articles and 33 original articles. Conclusions: the concept and classification of postoperative pancreatic fistula constitutes a valid tool for the comparison of surgical results between institutions. The centralization of care in high-volume centers is the main measure to reduce this complication.

Laparoscopic approach of the left side of the pancreas. / Abordaje laparoscópico del páncreas izquierdo.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic left-sided pancreatectomy (LLP) is an increasingly used surgical technique for the treatment of benign and malignant lesions of the left side of the pancreas. The results of LLP as a treatment for primary pancreatic lesions of the head and tail of the pancreas were evaluated. METHODS: From November 2011 to November 2017, 18 patients underwent surgery for primary lesions of the pancreas by means of a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. An intra-abdominal drain tube was used in all cases, and the recommendations of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) were followed. RESULTS: The mean age was 66.5years (IQR 46-74). Among the 18 left pancreatectomies performed, four were with splenic preservation, and one was a central pancreatectomy. There were two conversions. The median surgical time was 247.5minutes (IQR 242-275). The median postoperative hospital stay was 7days (IQR 6-8). After 90days, complications were detected in five patients: three gradeII, one gradeIII and one gradeV according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. There was one gradeB pancreatic fistula, and four patients had to be readmitted to hospital because of peripancreatic collections. The anatomic pathology diagnosis was malignant neoplasm in 38.9% of cases, all of them with negative resection margins. CONCLUSIONS: LLP can be considered the technique of choice in the treatment of primary benign pancreatic lesions and an alternative to the open approach in selected patients diagnosed with malignant pancreatic lesions.

O valor da amilase, obtido precocemente nos drenos abdominais, é teste útil em prever a ocorrência de fístula pancreática após duodenopancreatectomia: lições aprendidas de um centro do Sul do Brasil / Early drain fluid amylase is useful to predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: lessons learned from a southern brazilian center

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula represents the most feared complication after pancreatoduodenectomies, being the major responsible for the high morbidity and mortality after this operation. Its incidence remains around 10% to 30%. In recent years, several authors have studied the value of amylase in abdominal drains fluid, measured at an early stage after the surgical procedure, as a useful tool to identify patients at risk of developing pancreatic fistula. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the value of early drain fluid amylase as a method to predict the occurrence and severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomies. METHODS: We evaluated 102 prospective patients submitted to pancreatoduodenectomies from January 2013 to June 2017. The mensuration of amylase in abdominal drains was performed on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 in all patients. Patients were divided into three groups according to postoperative day 1 (POD1) results: values <270 U/L (group 1); between 271 and 5.000 U/L (group 2); and values >5.000 U/L (group 3). RESULTS: The incidence of pancreatic fistula was 25.5%, being 3.33%, 27.3% and 41.02% in the three groups, respectively. Compared with group 1, the risk of developing pancreatic fistula increased with increasing amylase values on POD1. Amylase values on POD1 and POD3 of patients with pancreatic fistula were higher than in the other ones without this complication (P<0.001). In addition, in group 3, 37.5% of patients with pancreatic fistula evolved to death (P<0.001). Finally, in this group, patients who died had drain fluid amylase values on POD1 significantly higher than the others in the same group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Early drain fluid amylase value is a useful test to stratify patients in relation to the risk of developing pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomies, in addition to correlate with the severity of this complication.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: A fístula pancreática representa a complicação mais temida após as duodenopancreatectomias, sendo a grande responsável pela elevada morbi-mortalidade após esta operação. Sua incidência permanece em torno de 10% a 30%. Nos últimos anos, diversos trabalhos têm estudado o valor da amilase nos drenos abdominais, medido de forma precoce após o procedimento cirúrgico, como ferramenta útil para a identificação dos pacientes sob risco de desenvolver fístula pancreática. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o valor da amilase no fluido dos drenos abdominais, obtido precocemente no pós-operatório, como método para prever a ocorrência e severidade da fístula pancreática nos pacientes submetidos a duodenopancreatectomias. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 102 pacientes prospectivos submetidos a duodenopancreatectomias no período de janeiro de 2013 a junho de 2017. A dosagem da amilase nos drenos abdominais foi realizada nos dias 1, 3, 5 e 7 em todos os pacientes. Os pacientes foram divididos em três grupos conforme os resultados do 1o PO: valores <270 U/L (grupo 1); entre 271 e 5.000 U/L (grupo 2); e valores >5.000 U/L (grupo 3). RESULTADOS: A incidência de fístula pancreática foi de 25,5%, sendo 3,33%, 27,3% e 41,02% nos três grupos, respectivamente. Comparados ao grupo 1, o risco de desenvolver fístula pancreática foi crescente com o aumento da amilase no 1o PO. Os valores das amilases no 1o PO e 3o PO dos pacientes com fístula pancreática foram maiores do que nos pacientes sem essa complicação (P<0,001). Além disso, no grupo 3, 37,5% dos pacientes com fístula pancreática evoluíram para óbito (P<0,001). Por fim, neste grupo, os pacientes que evoluíram para óbito tiveram valores de amilase no 1o PO significativamente maiores do que os demais pacientes (P<0,001). CONCLUSÃO: O valor da amilase, medido de forma precoce nos drenos abdominais no pós-operatório de duodenopancreatectomias, é teste útil para estratificar pacientes em relação ao risco de apresentar fístula pancreática, além de se correlacionar com a severidade dessa complicação.

Neoplasia sólida pseudopapilar del páncreas / Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas

Antecedentes: la neoplasia sólida pseudopapilar (NSSP) del páncreas es un raro tumor pancreático que se da comúnmente en mujeres jóvenes. Por lo general, son poco sintomáticos y el pronóstico es bueno ante cirugía resectiva. Objetivo: describir 6 casos tratados en 3 centros diferentes y hacer una revisión actualizada del tema. Material y métodos: análisis de historias clínicas, biopsias y protocolos quirúrgicos. Período enero de 2014 hasta abril de 2017. Resultados: encontramos 6 casos (5 mujeres y 1 hombre); el promedio de edad fue 39,7 años (rango 28 a 54 años). En 3 casos se trató de hallazgos incidentales. En todos los casos se utlizaron Ecografia y tomografia computarizada (TC) para el diagnóstico y en 2 casos se realizó resonancia magnética (RM). Todos los tumores se encontraron en el cuerpo o la cola del páncreas o en ambos. En 2 cirugías se realizó un abordaje videolaparoscópico; el tempo quirúrgico promedio fue de 91,17 minutos y el promedio de días de hospitalización fue de 5,5, con 3 pacientes que reingresaron por complicaciones durante el posoperatorio (un absceso y 2 fistulas pancreáticas). Conclusiones: se trata de tumores poco frecuentes; sin embargo, creemos que el avance en métodos por imágenes permitrá aumentar el diagnóstico y tratamiento de esta patología por lo que su incidencia aumentará. Queremos destacar la importancia del abordaje videolaparoscópico para este tpo de patología, ya que en la mayoría de los casos resulta factible con buenos resultados. Estas cirugías deben realizarse en centros donde puedan manejarse sus complicaciones para evitar reintervenciones.

Background: Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasia (NSSP) pancreas is a rare pancreatic tumor commonly found in young women. They are usually not very symptomatic and the prognosis is good in resective surgery. Objective: to describe 6 cases from 3 diferent centers and to make an updated review of the topic. Materials and methods: analysis of clinical histories, biopsies and surgical protocols. Period from January 2014 to April 2017. Results: we found 6 cases, with 5 women and 1 male; the mean age was 39.7 years (range 28 to 54 years). In 3 cases we dealt with incidental findings. In all cases, echography and CAT were used for the diagnosis and in 2 cases, MRI was performed. All tumors were found in the body and / or tail of the pancreas. In 2 surgeries a videolaparoscopic approach was performed, the mean surgical tme was 91.17 minutes and the mean number of days of hospitalizaton was 5.5, with 3 patents reentered for postoperative complicatons (one abscess and two pancreatic fistulas). Conclusions: these tumors are rare; however we believe that the advances in imaging methods will increase the diagnosis and treatment of this pathology so that its incidence will increase. We want to emphasize the importance of the videolaparoscopic approach for this type of pathology since in most cases it is feasible with good results. These surgeries should be performed in a center where their complicatons can be managed to avoid reinterventons.